| Pages: [1] |
1. Which are sweeter? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
I RP (in game at least) but you won't get any tears from me. Of course, I don't care if I lose everything; wonderful thing about Eve is you can always start over and someone will always be under you.
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.14 14:21:00
|
2. SMOKING GUN RECOVERED or Why no pirate should vote for Mazzilliu - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Originally by: Gypsio III I haven't read this thread. But if your idea of lowsec PVP is "gatecamping", then yes, I can see why you'd think that logoffski is a problem. And you deserve it. Logoffski is an abuse of an illogical game mech...
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.12 19:32:00
|
3. No subject - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
IIRC, Concord has ahold of Jovian tech, so even one of their frids would **** a player cruiser.
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.12 19:21:00
|
4. [TMA] What C&P thinks low-sec should be - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Quote: I think it would be interesting to have the NPC navy patrolling low sec systems on a sliding scale ( heavier presence in 0.4 than 0.1 ). I wouldnt want them to spawn in response to an incident in missions or plexes etc but i think it ...
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.11 13:42:00
|
5. Boosting lowsec by getting rid of it - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Interesting idea. Perhaps a slight modification: Instead of a linear coorilation, how about a cosine curve (well half). Basically, a 1-.8 you'd be almost always safe (>90%). .5 would be 50%. And .3-.1 would be close to 0, but not quite. This pr...
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.11 13:37:00
|
6. Boosting low sec: removing lvl 4's from high sec is not the way - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
I agree with much of what you said. However, I also agree with one thing said by Grikath. Pirates using alts to fund their game is a problem. Why? Because they lose all risk involved. If they run low on money, they can just run missions on their ...
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.11 12:28:00
|
7. Yaharr! I'm running for the CSM and I have some plans for piracy - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Someone mentioned moving all the ice fields to lowsec. This could work. It would force some form of commerce involving lowsec. It would mean that 0.0 can't survive alone, and would defiantly "improve" lowsec, at least temporarily. The only thing t...
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.10 13:25:00
|
8. CAN I HAS UR STUFF!!? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Originally by: CanIHave YourStuff Asking for peoples stuff is childish. Love irony...
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.09 16:44:00
|
9. Ankhesentapemkah for CSM - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Originally by: Jebediah Beane I totally understood the message Lana was trying to get across. My worry is that people would take it exactly as Lana had put in the post, quite literally, nod their head in agreeance, and say that these are g...
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.09 15:45:00
|
10. Ankhesentapemkah for CSM - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Quote: Noob gets in to his new ship and undocks.. targets a friendly as he is playing about and oops, accidentally fires. Pop gos his ship and its off to lowsec for you. This in and of itself is a terrible idea. If the noobs find themselv...
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.09 03:04:00
|
11. Allow for dictors to bubble pods in lowsec - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Oh calm down. I'm new to the game (a month maybe), and this is my first MMO, so I am officially a noob. However, I'm not scared one bit of lowsec or nullsec. I wouldn't take an expesive uninsured ship there, but I regularly cruize around in my A...
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.07 12:55:00
|
12. Good reason for no AFK Cloaking - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
I see a simple solution to the afk cloak thing. If they are cloaked and haven't done anything, haven't even moved the camera, for over an hour, they are probably afk. In that case, they should be logged off. Simple. A more fun way (for some) wou...
- by Francais Tempest - at 2010.05.07 12:36:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |